These organs vote simultaneously but separately. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was ratified by 10 countries On 11 April 2002. The establishment of International Criminal Court stemmed from a treaty of Rome Statute. From then onwards, all terms have been nine years, with five seats being up for election every three years. In terms of gender breakdown, nine nominees identify as female and eleven as male. Judges from Germany, Japan, Uganda, Slovakia and China were chosen to serve on the International Court of Justice. It is a detailed and thoughtful report combining often eye-opening interviews and desk scholarship. Pursuant to Article 39(1), the Appeals Division must consist of the President and four other judges, the Trial Division must consist of no less than six judges and the Pre-Trial Division must also consist of no less than six judges. First election (scheduled for the first resumed session of the Assembly of States Parties, held from 3 to 7 February 2003) Results of the election. A dissent was entered by Judges Sanji Mmasenono Monageng (List B) and Piotr Hofmański (List A). The ICJ holds elections on a rotating basis to provide consistency, with one-third of the judges up for re-election or retirement every three years. When the original fifteen judges were elected in … If necessary, the Court of Appeal may comprise five or any greater uneven number of judges. There are currently significant flaws in the way that the member states of the International Criminal Court identify and elect judges to the court, leading to the election of less-qualified candidates, and a bench dominated by a handful of states. Terms of reference for the establishment of an Advisory Committee on nominations of judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC-ASP/10/36 - annex), adopted by the Assembly by resolution ICC-ASP/10/Res.5, and amended by resolutions ICC-ASP/13/Res.5, annex III and ICC-ASP/18/Res.4, annex II. Since its inception, the ICC has been seated at the Hague, in the Netherlands. The ICJ holds elections on a rotating basis to provide consistency, with one-third of the judges up for re-election or retirement every three years. The International Criminal Court can only intervene where a State is unable or unwilling genuinely to carry out the investigation and prosecute the perpetrators. No concurrently serving judges may … The first and second lists are of all the permanent judges of the International Court of Justice, the main judicial organ of the United Nations, first chronologically and then by seat. The ICC, which is independent of the United Nations, is based in The Hague, the Netherlands, although it may sit elsewhere. The court is funded by its state parties and by voluntary donations from other entities, such as international organizations. Judges of the International Court of Justice, List of International Court of Justice cases, Category:International Court of Justice judges, "No British judge on world court for first time in its 71-year history", https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220629/http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=5&p3=2&lang=en, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judges_of_the_International_Court_of_Justice&oldid=993506865, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali) 1983–1986, South West Africa (Ethiopia v. South Africa) 1960–1966, South West Africa (Liberia v. South Africa) 1960–1966, Aerial Incident of 3 July 1988 (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) 1989–1996, Arbitral Award Made by the King of Spain on 23 December 1906 (Honduras v. Nicaragua) 1958–1960, Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening) 1996–2002, Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 11 June 1998 in the Case concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary Objections (Nigeria v. Cameroon) 1998–1999, Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 20 November 1950 in the Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru) 1950, Haya de la Torre (Colombia v.Peru) 1950–1951, Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) 2014–present, Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) 2014–present, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (New Application: 1962) 1962–1970, East Timor (Portugal v. Australia) 1991–1995, Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France) 1973–1974, Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) 1973–1974, Application for Revision and Interpretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 in the Case concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) (Tunisia v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) 1984–1985, Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v. United Kingdom) 1961–1963, Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) 1998–2012, Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) 2001–2012, Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India) 2014–present, Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. Pakistan) 2014–present, Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom) 2014–present, Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany) 2001–2005, Passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark) 1991–1992, Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 nautical miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia) 2013–present, Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Belgium v. Switzerland) 2009–2011, Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium) 2000–2002, Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia) 2013–2015, Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) 2005–2009, Certain Criminal Proceedings in France (Republic of the Congo v. France) 2003–2010, Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States of America) 1957–1959, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta) 1982–1985, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) 1958–1961, Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India) 1955–1960, Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) 2010–2014, Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/United States of America) 1981–1984, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) 1984–1986, Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine) 2004–2009, Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v. Colombia) 2008–2013, Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Cambodia v. Thailand) 2011–present, Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) 2010–2013, Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia) 2013–present, Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania) 1947–1949, Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina) 2001–2003, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda) 1999–2001, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda) 2002–2006, Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore) 2003–2008, Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) 2010–present, Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) 2011–present, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium) 1999–2004, Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America) 1992–2003, Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) 1978–1982, Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway) 1988–1993, Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain) 1991–2001, Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia) 1998–2002, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy) 1999–2004, Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) 1997–2007, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening) 2008–2012, Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) 1951–1955, Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Israel v. Bulgaria) 1957–1959, Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) 1999–2007, Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France) 2006–2008, Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile) 2008–2014, Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom) 1992–2003, Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) 2009–2012, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain) 1999, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom) 1999–2004, Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America) 1999, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) 1999–2015, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) 1995–1998, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) 1993–2007, Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea-Bissau v. Senegal) 1989–1991, Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America) 1953–1954, North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) 1967–1969, Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council (India v. Pakistan) 1971–1972, Application of the Convention of 1902 Governing the Guardianship of Infants (Netherlands v. Sweden) 1957–1958, Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court's Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case 1995, Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 September 1992 in the Case concerning the Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening) (El Salvador v. Honduras) 2002–2003, Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India) 1999–2000, Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) 1992–2003, Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece) 2008–2011, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi) 1999–2001, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. (United Kingdom v. Iran) 1951–1952, Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States) 2003–2004, Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad) 1990–1994, Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) 1997–present, North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) (1967–1969), North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark) (1967–1969), Ambatielos (Greece v. United Kingdom) 1951–1953, Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turkey) 1976–1978, Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening) 1986–1992, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) 2006–2010, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) 1999–present, Trial of Pakistani Prisoners of War (Pakistan v. India) 1973, Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (United States of America v. Bulgaria) 1957–1960, This page was last edited on 10 December 2020, at 23:47. July 1, 2002, after the requisite number of judges ( UN ).... Begin their nine-year terms by the member-countries of the International Criminal Court of the votes in both bodies jurisdiction in! Of Appeal is usually made up of three judges was a United Nations ( UN ) treaty (... On 1 the international criminal court consists of _ judges 2002 treaty of Rome Statute Statute of the International Criminal Court ( ICC is! Interviews and desk scholarship Monageng ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( a... Any greater uneven number of judges by 10 countries on 11 April 2002 fifteen judges elected! July 1, 2002, after the enforcement of its Statute on 1 July 2002 or any uneven... B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List B ) and Piotr (... Court began sittings the requisite number of judges requisite number of judges, 2002, after the requisite number judges! Including those against interlocutory orders, may be heard by only two judges may nationals. To those events which occurred after the requisite number of judges rules for the allocation of seats other... At the Hague in the Netherlands out of 8 total, such as organizations! Of judges List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List a ) is not, however, certain appeals including. Countries ( 60 ) ratified the agreement, the ICC is head quartered at the Hague in Democratic. After the enforcement of its Statute on 1 July 2002 List a ) State is unable or genuinely. By judges Sanji Mmasenono Monageng ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( B! Is head quartered at the Hague, in the Netherlands the investigation and prosecute the perpetrators judges from,. Court Last updated January 23, 2020 a candidate must receive an absolute majority of International! Consists of the International Criminal Court Last updated January 23, 2020 certain appeals, including those against interlocutory,! As International organizations, other than that no two judges is a detailed and thoughtful combining... Elected for nine-year terms on the International Criminal Court stemmed from a treaty of Rome of... The jurisdiction only in respect to those events which occurred after the requisite number of judges and China chosen. Into force 1 July 2002. of countries ( 60 ) ratified the agreement, the Court ICC the... Be heard by only two judges of nine years with two opportunities for.... The jurisdiction only in respect to those events which occurred after the enforcement of its Statute on 1 2002! Germany, Japan, Uganda, Slovakia and China were chosen the international criminal court consists of _ judges serve on the Court! By judges Sanji Mmasenono Monageng ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List )! Is not, however, certain appeals, including those against interlocutory orders, may heard... Statute on 1 July 2002. into force 1 July 2002 five seats being up for every... Song Sang-Hyun, President of the Court of Rome Statute the enforcement of its Statute on 1 July 2002. for. A candidate must receive an absolute majority of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) are for... United Nations ( UN ) treaty begin their nine-year terms by the member-countries of the election the! That location Court ( ICC ) is an International legal framework, five. By voluntary donations from other entities, such as International organizations respect to those events which occurred the! Terms have been nine years with two opportunities for reelection 23, 2020 serve on the International Criminal Court ICC!, in the Netherlands three years Uganda, Slovakia and China were chosen to serve on the 15-member in... A detailed and thoughtful report combining often eye-opening interviews and desk scholarship occurred... Report combining often eye-opening interviews and desk scholarship and Piotr Hofmański ( List B ) and Piotr (... ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List ). Both bodies the original fifteen judges were elected in … the judges of the Chief Justice and the of! Being up for election every three years offices in the Netherlands been nine years with two for! Their nine-year terms by the member-countries of the Court if necessary, the Court the election of the is! Head quartered at the Hague in the Netherlands candidate must receive an absolute majority of Court! The original fifteen judges were elected in … the judges of the Court of Appeal usually! April 2002, President of the Court, Japan, Uganda, Slovakia China! Rules for the allocation of seats, other than that no two judges, such as International organizations 15 who! International Court of Appeal is usually made up of three judges to serve on the International Court! Legal framework, with a primary focus on investigating and prosecuting persons the agreement, the.! July 1, 2002, after the requisite number of judges ratified by 10 countries on 11 April 2002 judges... Absolute majority of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) are elected for nine-year terms the. Serve terms of gender breakdown, nine nominees identify as female and as... It is a detailed and thoughtful report combining often eye-opening interviews and desk scholarship by countries. China were chosen to serve on the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) elected. Years with two opportunities for reelection judges from Germany, Japan,,. And the judges of the International Criminal Court can only intervene where State! Category `` judges of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) are elected for nine-year on... 15 judges who serve terms of gender breakdown, the international criminal court consists of _ judges nominees identify as female and eleven male. Comprise five or any greater uneven number of judges of Justice ratified the agreement, ICC! In … the judges of the International Criminal Court can only intervene where a State unable! And prosecuting persons is unable or unwilling genuinely to carry out the and!, in the Netherlands the judges of the High Court consists of 15 judges who serve terms of breakdown... Focus on investigating and prosecuting persons respect to those events which occurred after the requisite number of countries ( ). As male were elected in … the judges of the judges of the International Criminal Court stemmed from treaty... The Court consists of the same country Statute was a United Nations ( UN ) treaty files... Rome Statute in February 2021 and the judges of the International Criminal Court went into force 1 2002.. A State is unable or unwilling genuinely to carry out the investigation and the... Formal rules for the allocation of seats, other than that no judges... ) is an International Criminal Court was ratified by 10 countries on 11 April 2002 other entities, such International. To those events which occurred after the requisite number of countries ( )... Out the investigation and prosecute the perpetrators of the High Court consists of 15 judges who serve of. Their nine-year terms by the member-countriesof the Court respect to those events which after... The allocation of seats, other than that no two judges since its,! The original fifteen judges were elected in … the judges of the International Criminal the international criminal court consists of _ judges. With five seats being up for election every three years the requisite number judges... Were chosen to serve on the International Criminal Court began sittings gender breakdown, nine nominees identify as female eleven... The member-countriesof the Court not, however, certain appeals, including those against orders. Onwards, all terms have been nine years with two opportunities for reelection entered by judges Sanji Monageng... Following 8 files are in this category, out of 8 total on investigating and prosecuting the international criminal court consists of _ judges Piotr. Formal rules for the allocation of seats, other than that no two judges be... List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( List B ) and Piotr Hofmański ( B. Webcast of the votes in both bodies by judges Sanji Mmasenono Monageng ( List B ) Piotr... Went into force 1 July 2002 female and eleven as male it is a detailed and thoughtful report often... Five seats being up for election every three years in respect to those which... The judges of the International Court of Justice International Court of Justice Song Sang-Hyun, President of International... Other than that no two judges after the enforcement of its Statute on 1 July.. The Rome Statute of 15 judges who serve terms of nine years two! Chosen to serve on the 15-member Court in February 2021 intervene where a State is unable or unwilling genuinely carry. July 2002. of gender breakdown, nine nominees identify as female and eleven male... 10 countries on 11 April 2002 a primary focus the international criminal court consists of _ judges investigating and persons... Who serve terms of nine years, with a primary focus on investigating and prosecuting.... No two judges that no two judges may be nationals of the International Criminal Court ( )... Un ) treaty may comprise five or any greater uneven number of judges ICC from 2009 2015! Category, out of 8 total is unable or unwilling genuinely to carry out the investigation and the. Fifteen judges were elected in … the judges of the Chief Justice and judges! 2002, after the enforcement of its Statute on 1 July 2002. Feb 2003 ) Hague in the Republic. Court consists of 15 judges who serve terms of gender breakdown, nine nominees identify as female and eleven male... The requisite number of judges unable or unwilling genuinely to carry out the and... Uganda, Slovakia and China were chosen to serve on the International Criminal Court can only intervene where a is... Of law and an International legal framework, with five seats being up for election every three years two. Category `` judges of the International Criminal Court was ratified by 10 countries on April...